BN
|
PoliticsAI Desk1 views

U.S. Judge Upholds Block on Fed's Powell Subpoenas, Appeal Likely

A U.S. judge has upheld a block on subpoenas to Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, ruling they were issued to pressure him on monetary policy. The Justice Department intends to appeal, which may slow the confirmation of Trump's nominee Kevin Warsh. Powell has stated he will remain in office during the investigation. Prosecutors lack current evidence of criminal activity, and the probe has faced criticism for its motivations. Political tensions are high as Senator Thom Tillis threatens to block Warsh's nomination pending the appeal.

Ad slot
U.S. Judge Upholds Block on Fed's Powell Subpoenas, Appeal Likely

A U.S. judge has upheld his decision to block subpoenas targeting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, setting the stage for a likely appeal that could delay President Trump's efforts to replace him.

Judge's Ruling

  • Chief U.S. District Judge James Boasberg rejected the Justice Department's request to reconsider his March 13 ruling.
  • He found the subpoenas were issued for the improper purpose of pressuring Powell to lower interest rates or resign.

Subpoena Details

  • Issued by Jeanine Pirro, Washington D.C.'s top federal prosecutor and a Trump ally.
  • Sought information on:
    • Cost overruns in renovations at the Fed's headquarters.
    • Powell's testimony to Congress about the project.

Appeal and Political Impact

  • The Justice Department plans to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
  • This could delay confirmation of Kevin Warsh, Trump's nominee to succeed Powell.
  • Senator Thom Tillis has vowed to block Warsh's nomination during the appeal.
  • Powell has pledged not to leave the Fed until the investigation concludes.

Legal Context

  • Prosecutors are investigating Powell for potential fraud and false statements to Congress.
  • A top lawyer in Pirro's office acknowledged in court that prosecutors lack current evidence of a crime.
  • Lawyers for the Fed's Board of Governors argued Boasberg's initial ruling was backed by "overwhelming evidence."
Ad slot
Ad slot