President-elect Claudia Sheinbaum has announced a significant shift in the selection process for Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) ministers, proposing to put the decision to a popular vote instead of presidential appointment. This move is part of a broader judicial reform that aims to democratize the selection of judges, magistrates, and ministers across Mexico’s judicial system. Sheinbaum stated, “With this reform, if you see it that way, the next president is resigning from personally appointing the next ministers to the Court, and what do we do? We put it to popular vote”.The reform, which is set to be voted on in early September, proposes a selection process that Sheinbaum claims will ensure only those with a good public reputation, honesty, and necessary knowledge will be chosen for judicial positions. This change comes as Morena and its allies have secured a qualified majority in both chambers of the newly established LXVI Legislature, potentially allowing for constitutional changes.Sheinbaum has defended the reform and the new legislative majority, emphasizing their democratic nature and popular mandate. She cited recent polls indicating 63% public support for the direct election of judges and magistrates. The president-elect has also recognized the Electoral Tribunal (TEPJF) for upholding the law in confirming Morena’s majority, stating, “They complied with the law and with what the Constitution establishes, despite the pressures and everything they faced”.However, the reform has faced criticism from opposition parties and some legal scholars who worry about its implications for judicial independence. The Junta de Coordinación Política (Jucopo) has agreed to vote on the initiative before September 4, setting the stage for a potentially contentious debate in the coming days.
Key points
- President-elect Sheinbaum proposes popular vote for Supreme Court minister selection, replacing presidential appointments.
- Morena and allies secure qualified majority in both chambers of the new LXVI Legislature, potentially allowing for constitutional changes.
- The judicial reform, set for early September vote, aims to democratize the selection of judges, magistrates, and ministers.
- Sheinbaum defends the reform, citing 63% public support for direct election of judges and magistrates.
Contradictions👾While Sheinbaum emphasizes the democratic nature of the reforms, opposition parties and some legal scholars express concerns about potential impacts on judicial independence.
